<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for connections</title>
	<link>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog</link>
	<description>Pujan Roka on management and technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fall of Good-to-Great by Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=25#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=25#comment-13</guid>
		<description>To entitle this post as the "Fall of Good-to-Great" is questionable.  You just said yourself that the book itself provides some serious fundamental business values that I feel the majority of companies today lack.  I don't think "one drawback" can equate to the "fall" of Good-to-Great.  There's too much value in it to discount his years of management research and study so quick based on the failure of a few of these companies.  He never once stated in his book that the companies were invincible, but rather that they conducted themselves in a way, at the time, to earn extremely high returns when compared to the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To entitle this post as the &#8220;Fall of Good-to-Great&#8221; is questionable.  You just said yourself that the book itself provides some serious fundamental business values that I feel the majority of companies today lack.  I don&#8217;t think &#8220;one drawback&#8221; can equate to the &#8220;fall&#8221; of Good-to-Great.  There&#8217;s too much value in it to discount his years of management research and study so quick based on the failure of a few of these companies.  He never once stated in his book that the companies were invincible, but rather that they conducted themselves in a way, at the time, to earn extremely high returns when compared to the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tibet: Past and Present by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=28#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=28#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the American public is not aware of Tibet's history. The free Tibet movement as you say is a cultural hype. I wish the media could educate the public more than just showing his videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the American public is not aware of Tibet&#8217;s history. The free Tibet movement as you say is a cultural hype. I wish the media could educate the public more than just showing his videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fall of Good-to-Great by Vasco Duarte</title>
		<link>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=25#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasco Duarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pujanroka.com/blog/?p=25#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Your analysis of G2G is right on. But, then you fall victim of the exact same mistake Jim Collins did! "the Halo . believing that becaus a company is doing well now they will do well in the future.

Jim tried to look for a larger period than the life-span of Google, so Google was not even a contender for the G2G list. you make even that mistake of including a company that is in it's infancy.

Read "The Hallo Effect" by Rosenzweig. Jiam was wrong, but you are making the same mistakes he did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your analysis of G2G is right on. But, then you fall victim of the exact same mistake Jim Collins did! &#8220;the Halo . believing that becaus a company is doing well now they will do well in the future.</p>
<p>Jim tried to look for a larger period than the life-span of Google, so Google was not even a contender for the G2G list. you make even that mistake of including a company that is in it&#8217;s infancy.</p>
<p>Read &#8220;The Hallo Effect&#8221; by Rosenzweig. Jiam was wrong, but you are making the same mistakes he did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

